Discussion:
Bug#978954: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release
(too old to reply)
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
2021-01-08 10:00:02 UTC
Permalink
Right, it should certainly not be included in its current state in next
release.

But there is more into it. If you for instance try to install Opera from
stable (or oldstable or testing or unstable...) the .deb recommends
pepperflashplugin-nonfree, and you may end up to a situation like this:

https://askubuntu.com/q/1305914

So instead of dropping the package, I think the best thing to do is to
convert it to a dummy transitional package in all supported releases as
well as testing and unstable.

flashplugin-nonfree was handled by just dropping it:

https://bugs.debian.org/969112

But that has already happened, and so be it.

More talk about this topic at <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1871471>.
--
Cheers,

Gunnar Hjalmarsson
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj
Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
2021-01-12 14:00:01 UTC
Permalink
Hey Gunnar,

Do you know why Opera's debian package doesn't drop the dependency of
pepperflashplugin-nonfree??

I didn't find Opera's official announcement about their roadmap of
Flash's EOL.

But other browsers are already starting blocking flash. Even with the
plugin installed they still refuse to load flash content.

Yours,
Paul
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
2021-01-12 14:10:01 UTC
Permalink
Hi Paul!
Post by Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
Do you know why Opera's debian package doesn't drop the dependency
of pepperflashplugin-nonfree??
No. I suspect it's simply an oversight (which creates issues at the moment).

Cheers,

/ Gunnar
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
2021-01-12 14:20:01 UTC
Permalink
But let me add that even if Opera fixes that, users may think they want
to enable flash, try to install pepperflashplugin-nonfree, and with that
screw up dpkg. So the issue happens before they try to enable it in a
browser. I.e. as long as the package in its current state is present in
the archive.

/ Gunnar
Debian Bug Tracking System
2021-01-15 16:40:02 UTC
Permalink
severity -1 important
Bug #978954 [pepperflashplugin-nonfree] pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
retitle -1 pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm
Bug #978954 [pepperflashplugin-nonfree] pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release
Changed Bug title to 'pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm' from 'pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release'.
--
978954: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978954
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Debian Bug Tracking System
2021-05-17 20:10:01 UTC
Permalink
severity -1 serious
Bug #978954 [pepperflashplugin-nonfree] pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
978954: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978954
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Debian Bug Tracking System
2021-09-08 22:40:02 UTC
Permalink
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2021 22:37:11 +0000
with message-id <E1mO6Br-0005D9-***@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#979047: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #978954,
regarding pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ***@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
978954: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978954
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Loading...